Rockin’ Patent – Concert Technology Corp’s “Music Search Engine”

US Patent No. 7,680,788 - Concert Technology Corp - Music Search Engine - Rockin’ Patent - Patents Rock - Russell IP
  • Rockin’ Patent®: US Patent No. 7,680,788
  • Filed: 8 August 2003
  • In the name of: Concert Technology Corp
  • Title: Music Search Engine
  • What’s claimed”A method for encoding music for searching, the method comprising the steps of: generating a database of a plurality of songs; assigning an index value for each note of at least a portion of each of a plurality of songs in the song database; generating a difference sequence by calculating a difference of the index values between successive notes of each of the plurality of songs; inputting a sequence of notes; assigning an index value for each note of at least a portion of the input sequence; generating an input difference argument by calculating a difference of the index values between every two successive notes of at least a portion of the input sequence; and searching the database to find the song with the difference sequence exactly matching the difference argument; comparing hit number of exact matches between the difference argument and the difference sequences of the songs in the database to a predetermined threshold number; and performing a near search when the hit number is smaller than the predetermined threshold number.”
  • Why this patent rocks: This patent involves a music search engine that can find songs. Users have the option to search by music (notes), song attributes, or song patterns. The engine is used typically with a MIDI instrument or a keyboard/mouse to enter notes but also can be used by singing or humming a melody into a voice instrument (microphone). The method can identify the closest match for songs even when the note sequence contains mistakes or is in the wrong key.

If you’re a patent-savvy music tech business looking for patent help, get in touch with Russell IP here!

The information above is for general interest and information only and does not constitute legal advice.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

A banner representing Russell IP’s AI in IP blog post series

AI in IP: Potential Risks and Rewards

AI in IP: Potential Risks and Rewards of Using AI in Patent Work Explore potential risks and rewards relating to the use of AI in IP, with insights from Russell IP Founder and Director Iain Russell. Context Welcome to AI in IP, a series of blog posts sharing Iain Russell’s insights into the topic of artificial intelligence (AI) in intellectual property (IP). As Chair of the AI Committee of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Iain is a leading voice on how AI can be used in IP. The aim of this series is to highlight how AI can be used

Read More
A banner for Russell IP’s blog post on the EPO Fee Assistant tool

EPO Fee Assistant

Reducing European Patent Costs: Using The EPO Fee Assistant To Explore Fee Reductions Introduction: What Are Patent Official Fees? Applying for a patent is a significant financial investment. Official fees (the fees paid to patent offices) make up part of the total cost. Some patent offices offer official fee reductions to certain applicants. For example, the European Patent Office (EPO) offers several fee reductions in different circumstances. To help users of the European patent system explore some of the available fee reductions and support, the EPO provides an EPO Fee Assistant tool. This article explains how the EPO Fee Assistant

Read More

Gain the Competitive Edge

Let's see how we can help protect your IP

Get in touch using the contact form or the phone number below to see how we can protect your IP.

There’s no obligation to sign up for anything.