Rockin’ Patent – “Method Of Synthesizing A Musical Sound”

US Patent No. 4,018,121– Leland Stanford Junior University – Method Of Synthesizing A Musical Sound - Patents Rock - Russell IP
  • Rockin’ Patent®: US Patent No. 4,018,121
  • Filed: 2 May 1975
  • In the name of: (The Board of Trustees of) Leland Stanford Junior University
  • Title: Method Of Synthesizing A Musical Sound
  • What’s claimed: “A method of synthesizing a musical sound composed of a plurality of component frequencies and characterized by a time-varying amplitude envelope having a time-varying attack portion, a substantially steady-state portion and a time-varying decay portion, the steps comprising, generating a signal ωc to define a carrier frequency in the audio range, generating a signal ωm to define a modulation frequency in the audio range, generating a signal I(t) to define a time-varying modulation index, frequency modulating ωc with ωm to form a frequency modulated wave defined by e = Asin [ωc t + I(t) sin ωm t] where e defines the instantaneous amplitude of said wave, A defines the peak amplitude of said wave, and [ωc t + I(t) sin ωm t] defines the frequency spectrum of said wave wherein the frequency spectrum of said wave changes as a function of the modulation index I(t) to form a representation of said sound.”
  • Why this patent rocks: This blog by -ajxs suggests that this patent appears to relate to the frequency modulation synthesis technology that forms the basis of the Yamaha DX7 synthesiser. For a detailed technical analysis of the technology and the engineering of the Yamaha DX7, see here.

If you’re a patent-savvy music tech business looking for patent help, get in touch with Russell IP here!

The information above is for general interest and information only and does not constitute legal advice.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Banner for Russell IP article about Accelerating UK Patent Prosecution

Accelerating UK Patent Prosecution

Accelerating UK Patent Prosecution at the UK IPO: A Practical Guide Introduction Securing a UK patent is usually a long game. On a normal timetable, a UK patent application remains pending for several years before it is granted or finally refused. In many situations, that slow and steady pace is absolutely fine; it gives time to refine the technology, explore markets and spread costs. In other situations, there’s a need for the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) to move faster. Perhaps a competitor is gearing up to launch a similar product, an investor is asking to see patent grants

Read More
Banner for Russell IP article about guidance on generative AI in patent work

Guidance On Generative AI In Patent Work

New Guidance On Generative AI In Patent Work: Essential Reading For Inventors And SMEs The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) and the Intellectual Property Regulation Board (IPReg) have issued new guidance on using generative AI for patent work. In this article, we answer some key questions about the new guidance, and who and what it is for. Why The New CIPA Guidance On Generative AI Matters Generative AI tools are now everywhere. Many inventors and small, innovative businesses are already using them to:  Brainstorm product ideas; Tidy up technical descriptions; Help draft patent-related documents; or Summarise prior art and

Read More

Gain the Competitive Edge

Let's see how we can help protect your IP

Get in touch using the contact form or the phone number below to see how we can protect your IP.

There’s no obligation to sign up for anything.